v Response towards estate tax EFP II:

“To prevent anyone from losing such affordability of what has been passed on down from certain heirs. To alleviate the government debt, without the property being stripped entirely from the entities possession. Assets that can be sustained, such as properties being held under certain particular names, based on the will ; of what is signed.  As oppose to the amount of value that is increased for the property its self. What balances out as a fair and equal  occasio, as well as being able to sustain certain aspects of wealth? Along with eligibility of being able to still afford accessible  privileges to such property, or acres of lands;  terrains, even though the value may  have increcium due to the level of shift in our economy overtime. Would future generations would be able to sustain such royalties bound to such properties/assets that exist outside of just currency alone? Assets that is tied towards the family members name for which has been passed on down previous generations. Being able to sustain certain aspect of wealth is one thing. When it comes to having to strip such property from the entity, due to emergency financial circumstances. Would the entity be able to still have ties towards such property? As suppose to having to relocate and losing such entitlement?”